This entry was posted on Monday, December 15th, 2008 at 8:41 PM and is filed under Real Estate News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Have to say, most of those choices were pretty obvious. New York, LA, DC, Seattle, and San Francisco have been boom towns for the past two decades, and New Orleans, Detroit, and Milwaukee have been in the dumps for even longer. I tend to disagree with their characterization of Columbus; a lot of people are moving out there from Cleveland and elsewhere, even from Utah, because of some job expansion and the low cost of living.
Have to say, most of those choices were pretty obvious. New York, LA, DC, Seattle, and San Francisco have been boom towns for the past two decades, and New Orleans, Detroit, and Milwaukee have been in the dumps for even longer. I tend to disagree with their characterization of Columbus; a lot of people are moving out there from Cleveland and elsewhere, even from Utah, because of some job expansion and the low cost of living.